Housing Bubble: Home Supply Down 30% in 2008

by Brendon Carr

The Maeil Kyungjae’s English edition reports next year’s housing supply will be down 30% over 2007, thanks to Roh Moo Hyun’s housing policies which include punitive taxes on homeowners, and price controls on new units:

Housing supplies are expected to decrease 30 percent next year compared to this year.

According to a joint survey conducted by Maeil Business Newspaper and a realty information agency Dr.Apt on December 20 on 363 housing construction companies regarding their 2008 initial sales plan which includes apartments, commercial & residential complexes, studio apartments and town houses, total 323,544 apartment units were revealed to be supplied in 602 business sites—28.6 percent lower than the 453,589 units planned for this year.

Such a sharp decrease in housing supply is a consequence of construction companies retiring from their new business projects with the adoption of the initial sales price cap.

But in the Korean-language version of this story at the Maeil Kyungjae, a detailed breakdown of the decline in units coming on-line in 2008 reveals that although there are steep declines in new supply outside Seoul and Taejon, the supply in Seoul will increase a bit more than 16% in 2008 (21,642 units to be sold in 2008, compared to 18,174 in 2007). Considering there are already 100,000 unsold units nationwide, over 90,000 of which are in the provinces, this decline seems natural and inevitable. They overbuilt out there, given where everybody wants to live is Seoul. And it’s a relief to see that the supply in Seoul has not been completely choked off—in fact, it’s still going up.

But note that housing supply is a trailing indicator. Korean apartment complexes take about three years from ground-breaking and the initial concrete pouring to completion and occupancy/sale. My guess is the real bite of Roh’s housing-market meddling will be felt in Seoul between 2009 and 2012. My own interpretation of the post-2002 run-up in Korean housing prices is that it was one of the inevitable aftereffects of the 1998-1999 “IMF” contraction. Remember when all those construction companies went bust or nearly so? Well, they had difficulty getting finance for new housing starts, which meant they couldn’t build as many new apartments as Korea really needs.

What’s really odd is how few apartments (and other units of new-built housing) are made available in Seoul.

Assuming that “Seoul” means the city limits under the direct control of Seoul Metropolitan Government, and not the Incheon-to-Suwon-to-Uijeongbu conurbation around Seoul, we can see that one out of four Koreans lives in the City of Seoul. (If you count the greater metropolitan area, it’s one of two.)

Yet even with the 16% year-on-year increase in inventory, 21,642 units in Seoul accounts for just 6.7% of the new housing being made available nationwide.

So while the US$2.5 million 900 sq. ft. apartment in Kangnam may experience a little air (okay, maybe a lot) being let out of its price, I foresee continued inflation of the housing bubble for the rest of Seoul, when the supply of apartments to us in the capital takes the same steep downturn as the provinces are experiencing now.

I just hope I can sell my apartment and cash out before the storm.

Comments

3 Responses to This Entry

  1. Jin on

    Brendon,

    Wanted to let you know that I really enjoy reading your blog and in particular the articles and commentary on our housing / construction industries.  The dichotomy between the provincial glut of housing and shortage despite the demand in Seoul is striking.  Even in Busan, the abundance of very good quality housing is evident, something you never see here in the nation’s capital.  Couple that with the lack of affordable building—cost of materials is moving up at an alarming rate while the contractor’s margins are kept artificially high (can we say cartel, anyone?).  The perfect storm really: Limited supply where demand is highest, oversupply in all other locales, big profit-taking by construction companies.  Can the crash (sorry, market correction!) be that far behind?

  2. fencerider on

    what are your thoughts on the possiblity that this problem will cause people to move out of the city and into the provinces?  After all, with the KTX, its only a couple hours from Daegu and Kumi to Seoul...in Japan and some other highly populated areas, 2 hour commutes are not uncommon.  Just a thought....I don’t really know much about the housing market...i do see that here in Daegu there is a LOT of development and an enormous amount of advertising and “specials” trying to move these places....problem is that they are overpriced to begin with so there is not real deal.

  3. Brendon Carr on

    what are your thoughts on the possiblity that this problem will cause people to move out of the city and into the provinces?

    The problem is nobody wants to live in those places. Few Koreans who can work in Seoul would banish his family to some Godforsaken place like Taejon. For one thing, access to so-called “good schools” is limited out there. The farthest out a Seoulite could imagine living is somewhere like Osan/Dongtan.

    And KTX only works if you live right next to the station in the provincial city and work right next to the station in the Seoul metropolitan area. If you have to fight through traffic to get to the KTX station in the province, then fight through traffic in Seoul to get to the office, a two-hour commute starts to look fanciful.

    As for me, I live seven minutes from the office and couldn’t imagine living much farther away than that. I could probably live in a huge (100+ pyung) apartment out in Cheonan, even right next to the train station, ride 35 minutes into Seoul Station and then walk 5 minutes to the office. But what about my kids?

Comments Policy: Comments to Korea Law Blog are moderated. This means abusive, or just plain stupid comments will be deleted. So don't be a jerk. It also means there may be some delay from the time you post a comment to the time it shows up here. If your comment wasn't against the policy, it will show up in a little bit.




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Please enter the word you see in the image below: