SOUTHFIELD, MI /ACCESSWIRE/October 18, 2022/ Each year, more than 3 million non-fatal injuries and more than 150,000 deaths in the United States are attributed to bodily injury. Whether it’s workplace accidents, car accidents or defective products, millions of people have their lives interrupted by unexpected injuries. For many, these injuries cause significant financial and emotional hardship.
Personal injury lawyers are strong advocates and allies in the fight to ensure that every victim’s rights are protected and they get the compensation they deserve. However, with over 60,000 practicing personal injury attorneys across America and thousands in Michigan alone, choosing the right representation firm can be a significant challenge for those trying to heal and move on with their lives. .

This quarter, Lobb Law Firm discusses important considerations for victims seeking a personal injury attorney, and how these considerations can help prepare these victims for success.

Caught off guard: next steps after injury

Accidents are a part of life, and while many Michigan residents get by with a few bumps or bruises, thousands more are far less fortunate. Worse still, the vast majority of these injuries could have been avoided had it not been for the negligence of another party.

The aftermath of an accident and grappling with the reality of a serious injury can be daunting on many fronts, but one of the most important steps an injury victim can take is to seek legal advice from a experienced personal injury lawyer.

According to Lobb Law Firm, time is a critical element in solidifying a personal injury case. But it’s not just the timing of hiring a lawyer that counts, as is choosing the right lawyer or law firm for the matter.

Considerations When Choosing a Personal Injury Lawyer

Experience where it matters most

Nothing replaces experience, especially when it comes to personal injury law. With each case, a lawyer hones their skills, develops new relationships that can be leveraged for future cases, and gains an inside understanding of how local court systems work and how local judges act. All this (and more) can be

The story continues

Aggressive Trial Representation

Some personal injury companies or lawyers prefer to settle rather than deal with the headaches and expense of a lawsuit. Not the Lobb law firm. Their team is ready to fight for their clients, exploring all avenues to help them obtain the maximum verdict in their favor. The Firm will aggressively pursue negligent parties in and out of court.

Insurance companies inherently fear experienced attorneys, often favoring a settlement over an actual trial, and usually resulting in favorable terms for injured parties.

A documented track record of successful settlements and verdicts

For injury victims, seeking compensation from a negligent party is often their last resort and last hope to achieve the financial freedom needed to get back on their feet and regain a quality of life.

Injuries often result in large medical bills, work stoppages, the inability to pursue certain careers, rehabilitation, therapy, etc. The right personal injury company can help victims regain control of their lives, getting them the compensation they deserve.

Financial resources and a solid network

In law, it is not only about “what you know”, but also about “who you know”. Law is a complex, hierarchical and politically charged field where relationships matter. But people aren’t the only resources needed to build a successful claim. The ideal law firm will have both the human and financial capital to fund a client’s case. From accident reconstruction specialists to medical experts and forensic pathologists, building a strong case is often a financially intensive undertaking.

Fees and associated expenses related to the case

Personal injury victims often struggle to take on debt due to time off, medical bills, and rehabilitation (among other costs). This often leads individuals to think that they cannot afford a lawyer to seek compensation. Lobb Law Firm works on an emergency basis, which means clients pay nothing until they get a verdict or settlement in their favor. This gives customers the ability to pursue their claims without risking owing money they don’t have. Instead, Lobb Law Firm takes a percentage of the verdict or settlement awarded (if successful), covering all expenses associated with the claim, including filing fees, documentation fees, witnesses experts, etc.

reputation matters

Personal injury law is a highly competitive industry where only the fittest survive. Companies with strong reputations in the industry signal to negligent third parties and insurance companies that they are ready to fight. This perception can lend an element of strength in negotiations and can influence a positive outcome both in court and out of court.

About Lobb Law Firm

Founded in 1976 by Joseph R. Lobb and based in Southfield Michigan, The Lobb Law Firm is a statewide law firm specializing in fighting for the rights of injury victims.

Areas of practice include:

• personal injury

• Michigan No Fault Law

• Social Security

• Probate fee

• workers compensation

As a family owned and operated business, its mission serves one purpose, to protect the rights of those it serves. By handing over the “staff” in personal injury cases, each client is treated like a member of the family. The firm offers vigorous representation and a relentless pursuit of justice and compensation, as well as compassionate service and support to clients in need.

Those interested in learning more about the company or scheduling a free consultation are encouraged to contact through its official website or by calling 248-591-4090.

Source: https://thelobblawfirm.com/
Phone number: 248-591-4090
Email: [email protected]
Contact Name: Cherie Lobb

THE SOURCE: Lobb law firm

See the source version on accesswire.com:
https://www.accesswire.com/720907/The-Lobb-Law-Firm-Discusses-Necessary-Considerations-When-Choosing-a-Southfield-MI-Accident-Attorney

Judge Guzman will become a partner in the firm’s appellate practice

HOUSTON, September 6, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Wright Close & Barger LLP, a Houstonlaw firm specializing in civil trials and appeals, is pleased to announce the arrival of a former Texas Supreme Court Justice Eva Guzman as a partner of Houston Desk.

Judge Guzman will act as a partner in the firm’s appellate practice from September 12.

“I’m thrilled to join a team of call stars who bring great energy, creativity and a wealth of experience to solving customer problems,” said Judge Guzman.

Judge Guzman is the first Latina to serve on the Supreme Court of Texas and the first to hold statewide office. Before serving on from texas highest civil court, she was a judge in the Texas 14^e Court of Appeal and a Harris County District Court Judge. Throughout her career, she has adjudicated thousands of civil and criminal cases and written hundreds of court opinions.

“We are honored and delighted that Judge Guzman chose to practice law with us,” said Wright Close & Barger Managing Partner Thomas Wright. “She has extensive experience in appellate matters. Her knowledge of appellate matters will be invaluable to the firm and our clients.”

A native of Houston, Judge Guzman obtained his law degree from South Texas College of Law. She also holds a Master of Laws in Forensic Studies from duke university School of Law, where she studied under the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito.

Wright Close & Barger LLP is a Houstoncivil-based law and appeals firm that handles complex trial and appeals work for clients across Texas. Our lawyers have a reputation for obtaining favorable results in cases involving catastrophic personal injury, insurance coverage, intellectual property, oil and gas, product defects, commercial disputes, arbitration and mediation, trade secrets, and trust and estate disputes, among others. We also assist with pre-trial motions, special evidence issues, expert witness recusals, and critical work on the court’s charge to the jury. To learn more, visithttp://www.wrightclosebarger.com/.

Media Contact:  
April tunes
800-559-4534
[email protected]

SOURCEWright Close & Barger LLP

]]> https://korealawblog.com/free-cle-webinar-using-technology-to-design-effective-law-firm-processes-september-7-1100-am-1200-pm-pt-clio/ Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:20:01 +0000 https://korealawblog.com/free-cle-webinar-using-technology-to-design-effective-law-firm-processes-september-7-1100-am-1200-pm-pt-clio/

Steven A. Roseman
Managing partner
Roseman Law, APC

Steven Roseman is the Founder and Managing Partner of Roseman Law, APC, a full-service real estate firm specializing in representing homeowner associations as general counsel, collecting appraisals, and SB800 compliance.

For over (26) years, Mr. Roseman has represented homeowners associations and their boards of directors in their day-to-day legal affairs. In addition to representing homeowners associations and property owners in all facets of real estate matters, he also has extensive knowledge of dealing with local (city), county, including the Coastal Commission, and state agencies. , not only on behalf of his clients, but in his official capacity as Commissioner of the City of Calabasas Planning Commission.

He is a seasoned litigator and, since 2015, he has been named “Superlawyer” annually, a rating awarded to outstanding lawyers by their peers for their professional achievements, and less than 5% of lawyers achieve this recognition. Mr. Roseman is actively involved in numerous organizations. He is a member of the California and Nevada State Bars.

Mr. Roseman is also an active member of the two largest community interest development trade groups: the California Association of Community Managers (CACM) and the Community Associations Institute (CAI).

Mr. Roseman is a faculty member of (CACM) and lectures extensively throughout California, teaching CACM’s C-CAM Manager Certification, which includes Large Scale Management Certification and High Rise Management Certification . Mr. Roseman is a member of the board of directors and past president of the CAI – Channel Islands section. In addition, he serves on the Mediation Steering Committee for CAI-Los Angeles.

Mr. Roseman is also actively involved in legislative action at the state level, addressing issues that directly impact developments of common concern. He is involved with CAI’s Legislative Action Committee and as a delegate of CAI’s California Legislative Action Committee (CLAC).

SANDY, Utah, Aug. 11, 2022 (Gephardt Daily/Bill’s Marketplace/Sponsored) — We’ve all heard that old expression: “What’s in a name?”

Well, if your name is Brad DeBry and you’re a lawyer in Utah, that means a lot.

This means that as the son of the late great litigator Robert J. DeBry, long regarded by clients and peers as one of Utah’s most trusted and honest attorneys, you are part of a proud legal heritage, which spans more than 40 years.

It also means that when you left Robert J. DeBry and Associates, which was sold just before your father passed away in 2021, your new firm, Brad DeBry Law Firm, would be guided by the same principles learned alongside of your father – first as a child, then as a personal injury lawyer in his firm for 25 years.

The early years
Brad was just a boy in 1980, the year his father started what would become one of the best-known personal injury law firms in the Salt Lake City and Wasatch Front area. . In a recent interview with Bill’s Marketplace, Brad said some of his fondest memories go back to those early days working with his father in law firms. He took out a lot of legal files, made quite a few photocopies, and as he got a little older often went to the James E. Faust Law Library at the University of Utah to make copies of cases and then bring them . back for lawyers.

“There was no internet then, no email, no electronic filing, so I spent years going up to the law library for dad, making Xeroxes and bringing back stacks and stacks of cases,” Brad said. “And then one day he told me to start reading the cases. He asked me: ‘What do you think of this problem? How would you argue this case? And then, whatever my answer, he would challenge my thinking, trying to get me to analyze everything from a different point of view and really examine the arguments at hand.

“It’s this foundation, the praise of critical thinking, coupled with Dad’s compassion for helping his clients, that has shaped my path in life,” Brad said.

A career takes off
The discipline Brad adopted while working alongside his father, coupled with what his mother called “a natural gift for chatterbox,” proved useful as he embarked on his college career, where he studied history and subjects requiring a lot of reading and writing. , and analytical thinking, logically setting the stage for a law school run.

But while Brad honestly planned a legal career somewhere down the line, he had another passion and another career path in mind, one that would skyrocket him.

“Initially, right out of college, I started flying. I wanted to be a pilot. And so I trained to be a commercial airline pilot, got my license, and was certified to fly passenger jets for major airlines, I embarked on that career and ended up flying commercial passenger jets for SkyWest Airline,” said Brad.

“And although I loved being a pilot, I still felt the call to join the legal profession. I was already struggling with the decision of whether or not to apply to law school when Dad suddenly called.” I want you to come and do this, he said, “I want you to be a lawyer. You would be really good at that. You are good with people. I would like you to join the practice. I want you to do part of the team.”

Brad followed his father’s heartfelt advice. He graduated from the California Western School of Law in San Diego and was called to the bar in Utah in 1996. He later joined his father’s firm and helped guide the top-rated personal injury law firm through the of a legal career spanning more than two decades.

Founding Principles of the Brad DeBry Law Firm
When Brad decided to start his own legal department, he was determined that he would be guided by the same fundamental principles of honesty and compassion that underpinned his father’s practice.

“That’s why anyone who believes they have a claim receives a free case review for a legal professional to assess their situation,” Brad said. “Whether they are trying to cope with the devastating impact of wrongful death or injury resulting from a car accident, impaired driving accident, motorcycle or truck accident, their cases are examined free of charge.

Substantiated cases move quickly and clients can rest assured that there is no fees until their case is won. Brad DeBry Law Firm operates on a contingency fee basis, which means that if they don’t win the client’s case, they don’t send an invoice to the client.

Clients also know that when the Brad DeBry law firm takes on a case, they expect to win it.

Period.

“Once we accept a case, we act quickly,” Brad said. “After all, by the time most people see a lawyer, not only are they dealing with their injuries, but they are also dealing with financial issues, struggling to make ends meet, paying rent or mortgage, or just putting food on the table.

“The last thing they need, for example, is to be rattled off by an insurance company or other damaging party that is unwilling to fulfill its obligation to pay. This is where we come in and start working to make things right from day one.

The lawyer you know, the experience you trust
Asked about the best part of his job, Brad’s response was clear and concise.

“I want to help people who are in difficulty. I find great satisfaction in helping those who face truly life-changing challenges and helping them find their way,” Brad said. “I love helping them understand what’s really going on and then giving them guidance on what to do next. It’s especially rewarding when I’m caring for families, helping them get financial compensation to cover medical bills, rent and other expenses in extremely difficult times.

“And it might sound a little weird, but some of the people I like to help the most are those who never became my clients. We get calls from people who have physical injuries, but we also get calls from people struggling with a variety of issues that may not require the involvement of an attorney Very often I can spend 20 minutes or half an hour on the phone listening to them, giving them perspective and helping them chart their way without needing a lawyer.

“I find it very rewarding,” Brad said.

5 Star Ratings and Customer Reviews
Since the founding of the Brad DeBry Law Firm, dozens of clients have expressed their satisfaction and appreciation for the quality of work and compassion they have received demonstrated in their 5 star Google and Facebook ratings.

Their comments speak volumes.

Ashley Richey: “Brad is fantastic! So happy for all the help he gave me in such a difficult and stressful time with my accident. He definitely treats his clients like family and wants the best for them. I would recommend it to everyone.”

Wendy Connors: “Work hard for you and treat you like a human being, not just another case. Honest and they care about you.

Jose Rodriguez: “I had called with some questions regarding the traffic court. To my surprise, Brad himself answers the call and answers my questions. Even though traffic court is not something he usually deals with, he was always willing to help answer my questions as much as possible! Very helpful and caring!”

Romeo Drawn: “I would recommend this company and will continue to recommend it to my family and friends. Great people.

Michael Adamson: “I was very satisfied with this company. Quick response time when I left messages. I felt like they gave me honest answers to what I was looking for.

Melissa Tucker: “Brad Debry and Riley Waddoups were amazing. I appreciated their timely and transparent communication. 100% thrilled with the results they delivered. If you need advice for a personal injury problem of any kind, it would be worth taking the time to contact these knowledgeable, professional, local people who know the ins and outs of the legal system.

How to Contact the Brad DeBry Law Firm for a Free Case Review
If you or someone you love has been involved in a personal injury, contact Brad DeBry Law Firm for a free case review. They will navigate the legal and insurance process while you focus on your improvement.

Call (801) 515-0833

45 West Sego Lily Drive, Suite 315

Sandy, UT 84070

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors in Verano Holdings Corp. (“Verano” or “the Company”) (OTCMKTS:VRNOF) for violating securities laws.

The investigation aims to determine whether the Company has made false and/or misleading statements and/or has failed to disclose relevant information to investors. Verano a déposé un avis auprès de la SEC le 27 juillet 2022, annonçant que «[le26juillet2022àlasuited’examensinternesdelarémunérationetdelafiscalitécertaineserreurscomptablesontétédécouvertesetenconsultationavecVeranoHoldingCorp.«Société»)lecomitéd’auditduconseild’administration(le«comitéd’audit»)delaSociétéadéterminéquelaSociétéseratenuederetraiter»lesétatsfinanciersconsolidésintermédiairesrésumésnonauditésdelaSociétépourlestrimestresclosle31mars202130juin202130septembre202131mars2022etpourl’exerciceclosle31décembre2021.SelonlaSociété«lecomitéd’auditadéterminéquelachargederémunérationàbased’sharesoftheCompanyunderunitsofsharewereunderestimatedineachofthepreviousperiod’sfinancialstatements(i)mainlybecauseofthecalculationoftheseexpensesasifeachunitofrestrictedsharesacquiredoneshareofsubordinatevotingsharesoftheAdecategoryofthecompany(“SVShares”)insteadof100sharesSVand(ii)toalessestextentofuseoftheiovaluationmodelbetweenothersnsBlack-ScholestoevaluatetheserestrictedshareunitsinsteadofthedateofthegrantingofthetradingpriceoftheSVSharesunderlyingtheserestrictedshareunitsaslistedontheCanadianStockExchange.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us via the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com or by email at [email protected].

The class in this case has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to do nothing, you can remain an absent member of the group.

Schall Law Firm represents investors worldwide and specializes in securities class action and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions under applicable law and ethics rules.

On May 25, 2022, after months of investigation, the Law Society of Ontario (“OSL“) announcement that she had sued Aamer Chaudhry and NCA Exam Guru (“the Defendants“) for their alleged role in breaching and distributing confidential exam materials to license applicants. Declaration of complaint posted online as part of the LSO’s announcement seeks general damages and an injunction requiring the defendants to return and destroy any confidential material in their possession. At the time of writing this article, the defendants have not filed a statement of defense. They made a public statement, discussed below, and filed a request for clarification.

Background

The LSO is the gatekeeper for anyone wishing to become a lawyer in Ontario. It regulates and licenses all lawyers and paralegals in the province. The most common way to become a licensed lawyer in Ontario is to attend an Ontario law school, take the bar exam a few months after graduation, do a 10-month internship with a law firm of lawyers and then to attend the call of the bar ceremony where you are seated. in a hot, crowded room with 500 other contestants, waiting for your name to be called so they could briefly walk across the stage and shake a few hands.

There are other routes to becoming a lawyer in Ontario. You could attend a non-Ontario law school,¹ clerk at one of the courts instead of articling, or take the law practice program at Metropolitan University of Toronto’s Lincoln Alexander School of Law. However, one constant among all applicants is the bar exam. To practice in Ontario, you must pass the bar exam, which consists of two one-day multiple-choice tests – one test for lawyer-related law (think litigation) and one for lawyer-related law (think to transactional work).

Because the bar exam is universal for all candidates, there are a number of tutoring services that offer to help candidates prepare for the exam. One of the best known tutoring services was offered by Mr. Chaudhry² and his company, NCA Exam Guru. NCA Exam Guru is a professional tutoring service which, according to its website, helps candidates “convert their legal qualifications and take the NCA exam in Canada”, as well as offering assistance in preparing for the barrister exams and lawyers administered by the LSO.

Since every candidate must pass the bar exam, the LSO prioritizes security and integrity. To take the licensing exams, all examinees must sign a Candidate Agreement – ​​a contract between the examinee and the LSO prohibiting any form of dissemination, copying, or disclosure of exam content. Also, before COVID-19, when the bar exam was administered in person, there were rules about the types of pens or pencils you could bring to exams and the size and opacity of the Ziploc bag in which you could bring your supplies and have lunch. At the end of the exam, all open book materials given to you by the LSO and authorized to bring to the exams had to be left behind for the LSO to destroy.

Imagine the LSO’s shock and embarrassment when, in March 2022, it learned from evidence “strongly” indicating that candidates had somehow had access to questions and answers for the November 2021 session of the bar exam.

Applicants who have taken and passed the November session – and who were originally qualified for licensure in Ontario – have been advised by the LSO that “the Law Society is evaluating their exams and that their eligibility to be admitted to the bar is held in abeyance pending such assessment.”^₃

As a result of the alleged breach, the LSO abruptly postponed the March 2022 exam to April 2022, disrupting the scheduled testing date for all candidates. The LSO also promised to investigate the source of the breach and take all necessary steps to hold responsible parties accountable.⁴

In April, to give itself more time to investigate the breach and prevent further misconduct, the LSO also postponed the summer exam sessions from the scheduled June date to July 2022, and moved the exam from its previously online format (adopted in response to COVID-19) back in person.

The last-minute changes sparked protests from license applicants who were due to take the summer exams. In a open letter addressed to the LSO, the students underlined their “frustration and disappointment” with the abrupt change:

“By changing these dates with such minimal notice, the LSO has disrupted important plans made by countless future lawyers. This disruption not only impacts the individual lives of license applicants, but undermines the role of the LSO in as an effective, transparent and fair regulatory body that is responsive to the needs of those it regulates”.

The letter included signatures from more than 500 Ontario law students and licensing applicants pleading with the LSO to offer a seat on the exam on the original schedule.

The claim against Aamer Chaudhry and NCA Exam Guru

The Declaration of complaint alleges that Mr. Chaudhry and representatives of NCA Exam Guru improperly obtained and distributed answers to the November 2021 Lawyer Exam to clients enrolled in his course. The documents were reportedly distributed via email, Skype and WhatsApp messaging services. The Statement of Claim points out that Mr. Chaudhry allegedly “encouraged customers to use the fraudulent documents [on the
examination]The statement further alleges that the defendants “engaged in similar conduct with respect to other LSO licensing examinations”, but continue to investigate these allegations. This may appear to suggest that there has been inappropriate use of exam content in other exam sittings.

The LSO is seeking damages for breach of trust, conspiracy, inducing breach of contract, and copyright infringement, as well as an order requiring Mr. Chaudhry and his associates to return all of the exam content. The LSO also seeks damages for disgorgement of all profits derived (directly or indirectly) from the alleged copyright infringement, as well as punitive and aggravated damages in the amount of $100,000. The breach of trust and conspiracy allegations are discussed in more detail below.

Interestingly, the statement pleads that the candidates themselves suffered costs, inconvenience and stress, but refrains from making a claim on behalf of these candidates.⁵ It is unclear what role, if any, the innocent license applicants who have been affected by the defendants’ alleged actions will play in the proceedings.

A. Breach of Trust

The LSO alleges that Mr. Chaudhry and his associates committed the tort of breach of trust. Breach of confidence is a cause of action that provides legal relief for the misuse of information provided in confidence, which is then subjected to unauthorized use. A breach of trust complaint requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the trustee misused the information to the detriment of the trustee.⁶ In particular, it is a unique cause of action which may give rise to remedies at law or in equity.

In Lake Minerals Ltd. vs. International Corona Resources Ltd. (“Mineral Lake“),^seventhe Supreme Court of Canada has set out the elements of the tort of breach of trust:

(1) the information must have the necessary quality of trust about it;

(2) the information must have been disclosed in circumstances involving an obligation of confidentiality; and

(3) there must have been an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party that disclosed it.⁸

In this case, the LSO asserts that the exam content in question has a “necessary quality of trust about it” because past exam questions or exam answers are not provided to anyone and the candidate’s agreement provides that all exam content is confidential. The claim concedes that while it is unclear how the defendants accessed the content of the review, the defendants knew that the content had been disclosed in breach of confidentiality.

Finally, the use of the exam content was not authorized and was done to the detriment of the LSO. The candidate agreement explicitly prohibits any form of dissemination or copying of the exam content and any misappropriation naturally undermines the integrity of the LSO and the bar exam, harming the LSO and the legal profession as a whole. together.

B. Conspiracy

The LSO alleges that Mr. Chaudhry and his associates are responsible for conspiracy. A criminal association complaint can be based on two grounds:

1. First, there may be a conspiracy to injure, where persons act in concert with the predominant purpose of causing harm to the plaintiff and as a result actual harm is suffered by the plaintiff.




2. Second, there may be a conspiracy of unlawful acts, requiring persons, in concert, to engage in unlawful conduct towards the plaintiff in a manner likely to cause and result in injury to the plaintiff.⁹ To constitute unlawful conduct for the purposes of the second ground, the conduct must be “injurious in law, whether or not it is actionable in private law”.^ten The offense will not have occurred if only one of the persons engaged in illegal conduct.¹¹

In this case, the LSO relies on the second ground, namely that Mr. Chaudhry, NCA Exam Guru, and “other persons” associated with NCA Exam Guru acted in concert to obtain the content of the exam and distribute the content to its customers. The complaint further alleges that certain contestants entered into this agreement by virtue of the acceptance and, in some cases, the use of the content. The alleged illegal means include “obtaining, disseminating and using [exam content]”in violation of the LSO Applicant Agreement signed by all license applicants.

If the claim’s breach of confidentiality fails, the conspiracy claim may succeed under another wrongdoing set forth in the claim. For example, since the LSO also alleges copyright infringement and incites breach of contract, either of these allegations may be an “unlawful act” sufficient to ground the conspiracy allegation.

Response from Mr. Chaudhry

In response to the allegations, Mr. Chaudhry issued a statement denying the allegations, stating: “the allegations made by the Law Society are unproven and we will vigorously defend [the claim] if necessary in court. »

Footnotes

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

On May 25, 2022, after months of investigation, the Law Society of Ontario (“OSL”) announcement that he filed suit against Aamer Chaudhry and NCA Exam Guru (“the Defendants”) for their alleged role in breaching and distributing confidential exam materials to license applicants. The Declaration of complaint posted online as part of the LSO’s announcement seeks general damages and an injunction requiring the defendants to return and destroy any confidential material in their possession. At the time of writing this article, the defendants have not filed a statement of defense. They made a public statement, discussed below, and filed a request for clarification.

Background

The LSO is the gatekeeper for anyone wishing to become a lawyer in Ontario. It regulates and licenses all lawyers and paralegals in the province. The most common way to become a licensed lawyer in Ontario is to attend an Ontario law school, take the bar exam a few months after graduation, do a 10-month internship with a law firm of lawyers and then to attend the call of the bar ceremony where you are seated. in a hot, crowded room with 500 other contestants, waiting for your name to be called so they could briefly walk across the stage and shake a few hands.

There are other routes to becoming a lawyer in Ontario. You could attend a non-Ontario law school,¹ clerk at one of the courts instead of articling, or take the law practice program at Metropolitan University of Toronto’s Lincoln Alexander School of Law. However, one constant among all applicants is the bar exam. To practice in Ontario, you must pass the bar exam, which consists of two one-day multiple-choice tests – one test for lawyer-related law (think litigation) and one for lawyer-related law (think to transactional work).

Because the bar exam is universal for all candidates, there are a number of tutoring services that offer to help candidates prepare for the exam. One of the best known tutoring services was offered by Mr. Chaudhry² and his company, NCA Exam Guru. NCA Exam Guru is a professional tutoring service which, according to its website, helps candidates “convert their legal qualifications and take the NCA exam in Canada”, as well as offering assistance in preparing for the barrister exams and lawyers administered by the LSO.

Since every candidate must pass the bar exam, the LSO prioritizes security and integrity. To take the licensing exams, all examinees must sign a Candidate Agreement – ​​a contract between the examinee and the LSO prohibiting any form of dissemination, copying, or disclosure of exam content. Also, before COVID-19, when the bar exam was administered in person, there were rules about the types of pens or pencils you could bring to exams and the size and opacity of the Ziploc bag in which you could bring your supplies and have lunch. At the end of the exam, all open book materials given to you by the LSO and authorized to bring to the exams had to be left behind for the LSO to destroy.

Imagine the LSO’s shock and embarrassment when, in March 2022, it learned from evidence “strongly” indicating that candidates had somehow had access to questions and answers for the November 2021 session of the bar exam.

Applicants who have taken and passed the November session – and who were originally qualified for licensure in Ontario – have been advised by the LSO that “the Law Society is evaluating their exams and that their eligibility to be admitted to the bar stands pending this assessment.³

As a result of the alleged breach, the LSO abruptly postponed the March 2022 exam to April 2022, disrupting the scheduled testing date for all candidates. The LSO also promised to investigate the source of the breach and take all necessary steps to hold responsible parties accountable.⁴

In April, to give itself more time to investigate the breach and prevent further misconduct, the LSO also postponed the summer exam sessions from the scheduled June date to July 2022, and moved the exam from its previously online format (adopted in response to COVID-19) back in person.

The last-minute changes sparked protests from license applicants who were due to take the summer exams. In a open letter addressed to the LSO, the students underlined their “frustration and disappointment” with the abrupt change:

“By changing these dates with such minimal notice, the LSO has disrupted important plans made by countless future lawyers. This disruption not only impacts the individual lives of license applicants, but undermines the LSO’s role as an effective, transparent and fair regulator, responsive to the needs of those it regulates.

The letter included signatures from more than 500 Ontario law students and licensing applicants pleading with the LSO to offer a seat on the exam on the original schedule.

The claim against Aamer Chaudhry and NCA Exam Guru

The Declaration of complaint alleges that Mr. Chaudhry and representatives of NCA Exam Guru improperly obtained and distributed answers to the November 2021 Lawyer Exam to clients enrolled in his course. The documents were reportedly distributed via email, Skype and WhatsApp messaging services. The statement of claim points out that Mr. Chaudhry allegedly “encouraged his clients to use the fraudulent documents [on the examination].” The statement further alleges that the defendants “engaged in similar conduct in connection with other LSO licensing exams,” but continue to investigate these allegations. This may seem to suggest that there has been misuse of exam content in other exam sittings.

The LSO is seeking damages for breach of trust, conspiracy, inducing breach of contract, and copyright infringement, as well as an order requiring Mr. Chaudhry and his associates to return all of the exam content. The LSO also seeks damages for disgorgement of all profits derived (directly or indirectly) from the alleged copyright infringement, as well as punitive and aggravated damages in the amount of $100,000. The breach of trust and conspiracy allegations are discussed in more detail below.

Interestingly, the statement pleads that the candidates themselves suffered costs, inconvenience and stress, but refrains from making a claim on behalf of these candidates.⁵ It is unclear what role, if any, the innocent license applicants who have been affected by the defendants’ alleged actions will play in the proceedings.

A. Breach of Trust

The LSO alleges that Mr. Chaudhry and his associates committed the tort of breach of trust. Breach of confidence is a cause of action that provides legal relief for the misuse of information provided in confidence, which is then subjected to unauthorized use. A breach of trust complaint requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the trustee misused the information to the detriment of the trustee.⁶ In particular, it is a unique cause of action which may give rise to remedies at law or in equity.

In Lake Minerals Ltd. vs. International Corona Resources Ltd. (“Mineral Lake”),^seven the Supreme Court of Canada has set out the elements of the tort of breach of trust:

(1) the information must have the necessary quality of trust about it;

(2) the information must have been communicated in circumstances involving an obligation of confidentiality; and

(3) there must have been an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party who disclosed it.⁸

In this case, the LSO asserts that the exam content in question has a “necessary quality of trust in it” because past exam questions or exam answers are not provided to anyone and the candidate’s agreement provides that all exam content is confidential. The claim concedes that while it is unclear how the defendants accessed the content of the review, the defendants knew that the content had been disclosed in breach of confidentiality.

Finally, the use of the exam content was not authorized and was done to the detriment of the LSO. The candidate agreement explicitly prohibits any form of dissemination or copying of the exam content and any misappropriation naturally undermines the integrity of the LSO and the bar exam, harming the LSO and the legal profession as a whole. together.

B. Conspiracy

The LSO alleges that Mr. Chaudhry and his associates are responsible for conspiracy. A criminal association complaint can be based on two grounds:

1. First, there may be a conspiracy to injure, where persons act in concert with the predominant purpose of causing harm to the plaintiff and as a result actual harm is suffered by the plaintiff.
2. Second, there may be a conspiracy of unlawful acts, requiring persons, in concert, to engage in unlawful conduct towards the plaintiff in a manner likely to cause and result in injury to the plaintiff.⁹ To constitute unlawful conduct for the purposes of the second ground, the conduct must be “injurious in law, whether or not actionable in private law”.^ten The offense will not have occurred if only one of the persons engaged in illegal conduct.¹¹

In this case, the LSO relies on the second ground, namely that Mr. Chaudhry, NCA Exam Guru, and “other persons” associated with NCA Exam Guru acted in concert to obtain the content of the exam. and distribute the content to its customers. The complaint further alleges that certain contestants entered into this agreement by virtue of the acceptance and, in some cases, the use of the content. The alleged illegal means include “obtaining, disseminating and using the [exam content]” in violation of the LSO Applicant Agreement signed by all license applicants.

If the claim’s breach of confidentiality fails, the conspiracy claim may succeed under another wrongdoing set forth in the claim. For example, since the LSO also alleges copyright infringement and incites breach of contract, either of these allegations may be an “unlawful act” sufficient to ground the conspiracy allegation.

Response from Mr. Chaudhry

In response to the allegations, Mr. Chaudhry issued a statement denying the allegations, stating: “the allegations made by the Law Society are unproven and we will vigorously defend [the claim] if necessary in court.

NEW YORK, May 23, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds buyers of the securities of Bakkt Holdings, Inc. f/k/a VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings (NYSE: BKKT, BKKT-WT) (NASDAQ: VIHAU , VIH, VIHAW) (a) between May 7, 2021 and February 25, 2022 inclusive (the “Class Period”) and/or (b) in accordance with and/or traceable to the Offer Documents issued in connection with the combination of business between the Company and Bakkt Holdings, LLC (“Legacy Bakkt”) completed on or about October 15, 2021 (the “Business Combination”), the substantial June 20, 2022 lead applicant deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Bakkt securities during the Class Period, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of fees or out-of-pocket expenses through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Bakkt class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=5546 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for class action information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to act as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 20, 2022. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of the other class members to direct the litigation.

WHY THE ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified attorneys with proven track records in leadership roles. Often, companies issuing reviews do not have comparable experience, resources, or significant peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class action lawsuits, but are merely middlemen who refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in choosing lawyers. Rosen Law Firm represents investors worldwide, focusing its practice on securities class action and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has reached the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company. Rosen Law Firm was ranked #1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has ranked in the top 4 every year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of million dollars for investors. In 2019 alone, the company secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s lawyers have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

CASE DETAILS: According to the lawsuit, the offering documents were negligently prepared and, as a result, contained misrepresentations of material facts or failed to state other facts necessary for the statements made not to be misleading and not been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations governing their preparation, and that throughout the Class Period, the defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operations and compliance policies. Specifically, the Offering Documents and the Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Bakkt had faulty financial controls; (2) as a result, there have been errors in the Company’s financial statements relating to the misclassification of certain shares issued prior to the Business Combination; (3) as a result, Bakkt should restate some of its financial statements; (4) Bakkt minimized the true scope and severity of these issues; (5) Bakkt overstated its correction of its flawed financial controls; and (6) as a result, the Defendants’ offering documents and public statements throughout the Class Period were materially false and/or misleading and failed to provide the information that should be contained therein. When the real details entered the market, the lawsuit claims investors suffered damages.

To join the Bakkt class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=5546 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for class action information.

No class has been certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by an attorney unless you retain one. You can choose the lawyer of your choice. You can also remain an absent party member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to participate in any potential future recovery does not depend on their status as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Lawyer advertisement. Previous results do not guarantee a similar result.

——————————-

Contact information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, Pennsylvania
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Los Angeles, Calif.–(Newsfile Corp. – May 20, 2022) – Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against IronNet, Inc. (“IronNet” or “the company”) IRNT for violation of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s securities between September 15, 2021 and December 15, 2021 inclusive (the “Class Period”) are invited to contact the Company before June 21, 2022.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us via the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com or by e-mail at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to do nothing, you can remain an absent member of the group.

According to the complaint, the company made false and misleading statements to the market. IronNet has significantly overstated its financial outlook and business prospects. The Company was unable to accurately predict the timing of major revenue opportunities, which represented a significant portion of its revenue forecast. The Company failed to maintain effective disclosure controls. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the Class Period. When the market learned the truth about IronNet, investors suffered damage.

Join the case to recoup your losses.

Schall Law Firm represents investors worldwide and specializes in securities class action and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions under applicable law and ethical requirements.

CONTACT:

Schall law firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
[email protected]

THE SOURCE:
Schall law firm

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/124769